This is the governing body for certification in Disciplined Agile.

Develop Initial Release Plan

  • 19 Sep 2018 9:35 AM
    Reply # 6676590 on 5882919
    Scott Ambler (Administrator)

    We just released an update to this goal chapter.

    The big change is the addition of the Capture Plan decision point, something that was sorely missing.  Thanks Glen Little for pointing that out!

  • 22 May 2018 10:01 AM
    Reply # 6251740 on 5882919
    Scott Ambler (Administrator)

    @Aldo - Agreed.  That's a great option that is clearly missing.  Update coming soon!

  • 25 Apr 2018 5:07 PM
    Reply # 6120264 on 5882919

    Hi Folks

    Just a question on "Scheduling Strategy". There are three options; Date, Scope or Cost. 

    I was wondering about a situation where work is just continuously delivered, for instance in a team that just focuses on production bug fixes. It will be driven by the "as soon as possible" motive. 

    It could be time, but would it make sense to have a fourth option called "Continuous delivery" based on cycle time(s)?

    Thanks

    Aldo

  • 22 Apr 2018 1:46 PM
    Reply # 6114531 on 5882919
    Scott Ambler (Administrator)

    @Edson - Thanks for the feedback.  We've also seen something similar to what you call PATS.  I'm thinking something along the lines of "Team Leadership" may be more recognizable as a term.


    Keep your eye out for an update soon.

  • 30 Mar 2018 8:08 PM
    Reply # 6008883 on 5882919

    Develop Initial Release Plan->Scope

    Option: Product Solution

    Trade-off: In this option, there is a better alignment with the organizational portfolio. Sometimes it's difficult to develop a plan without considering the portfolio since there are dependencies and prioritization conflicts among teams. The prioritization of the portfolio is important by keeping the organization and its teams working on the right products.


  • 30 Mar 2018 7:41 PM
    Reply # 6008851 on 5882919

    Hi, I suggest another option and approach to the "source", that I have been using to achieve the Initial Release Plan goal in the organization I work for and it's been well succeded. Sometimes, it's very difficult to give this mission to a self-management team because either it is not formed yet or their members are still working on another project/product release. Given this context, the Product Owner, Architecture Owner, Team Lead and some key stakeholders could be the source to achieve this goal. I suggest naming it "PATS" option :)

    The key advantages:

    .There is no need to have the whole team formed or attending the sessions to achieve this goal

    .The business, scope, solution and planning views are preserved since the key stakeholders, PO, Architecture Owner, and Team Lead are concerned about that

    .This partial and initial team are going to deliver the solution minimizing the risk of "just selling and not doing it / delivering it"

    Thanks


  • 19 Mar 2018 11:36 AM
    Reply # 5987337 on 5882919
    Scott Ambler (Administrator)

    @Valentin, good point about the reasons.  Doing an update now.  Also updating the Choose Cadences decision point about small releases.

    @Maciej, also good points.  Updated the Source==>Self-Organizing Team discussion.  A regulatory project was the best example I could come up with for something with true fixed scope.  Only other category would be when something was sold to an external customer, but that would also likely have a fixed date (and likely cost) too.

    I will soon post an updated version of the excerpt.

  • 09 Mar 2018 9:03 AM
    Reply # 5931956 on 5882919

    couple of thoughts

    Develop Initial Release Plan -> Source

    Self organizing team - prefereably facilitator should be from outside of a team - from one side whole team takes part in discussion and we avoid risk of facilitator from inside the team to put pace or ideas, from the other outside facilitator (from outside company or at least other time) will not have any goal in directing team in any direction


    Develop Initial Release Plan -> Scheduling Strategy

    Scope driven - not sure if regulatory projects are best example as they have two constraints - scope and time. Here we consider scope driven approach



  • 04 Mar 2018 12:28 PM
    Reply # 5888399 on 5882919

    Develop Initial Release Plan -> Reasons: life-cycle and orchestration

    The release plan should reflect our decision/option about the lifecycle, having as inputs information about risks, incertitude, and specifics related to requirements solution and other aspects. The selected life-cycle should make possible the orchestration of all these aspects.   

     

    Develop Initial Release Plan -> Schedule: releases, small releases   

    The first cadence to be considered it is related to the length of the releases, where the suggestion of Agile Manifesto is to have weeks and months, with the preference for the shorter time periods. It is the same idea as the one behind shorter iterations. The complexity and problems of long releases will not be completely solved by iteration. That is one of the biggest weakness of Scrum, where release planning is mostly out of scope. XP and Disciplined Agile have already addressed this aspect. XP and Kent Beck use the “small release” concept. DA use a more explicit guideline of having an improvement roadmap, evolving from Agile Basic life-cycle to Continuous Delivery by reducing inception and transition phases, but also the overall release length until Continuous Delivery. Summarizing, the DA guidance recommends an improvement roadmap with evolution to smaller releases.  

    Here, in the Initial Release Plan, we just need to align this section with overall DA guidance.

    Example (proposal): “Smaller release are better because they provide more frequent opportunities for feedback and to adapt to business needs and changes and reduce the overall complexity of the development.”

     

    Last modified: 04 Mar 2018 12:29 PM | Valentin Tudor Mocanu
  • 28 Feb 2018 7:19 PM
    Message # 5882919
    Scott Ambler (Administrator)

    Please respond to this topic with any feedback you may have regarding the Develop Initial Release Plan excerpt.


    Thanks in advance!

© 2013-2019 Project Management Institute, Inc.

14 Campus Boulevard

Newtown Square, PA 19073-3299 USA

Powered by Wild Apricot Membership Software